Results

Oct 18, 2023	Case: 23-CT-038491	Judge Ingram
Facts:	Police were called out to a disturbance. Upon contact with the defendant, he appeared very intoxicated. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, watery eyes, and he was swaying. His movements were also very slow. The officer told him not to drive and go home. The defendant did not listen and then walked to his car, opened the driver's door and attempted to get in the driver's seat. The officer saw this and yelled at him to stop. The defendant was then detained. He then performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm pointed out to the State that on the body worn cameras you could see the defendant open the door but he never actually got into the driver's seat. Thus, he could not have been in actual physical control and never should have been arrested for DUI. The State agreed and amended the charge to a Failure to Obey an Officer's Command.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 18, 2023	Case: 23-CT-003889	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. She then performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test). She was then arrested for DUI and later blew a .146 and .142 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 17, 2023	Case: 23-CT-004892	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no lights on. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and an unsteady stance. He also had a wristband on from a club. Due to some physical injuries, he performed a seated battery of field sobriety tests such as a finger to nose while seated, a palm pat, and HGN (eye test). He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations written in the police reports about the specifics of the field sobriety tests were contradicted by the video tape. He was also not unsteady on tape and his speech was normal as well.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 17, 2023	Case: 23-CT-005271	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding (80 mph in a 45 mph zone). The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, fumbling fingers, and watery/glassy eyes. She performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .166. and .150 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 17, 2023	Case: 23-CT-004727	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and his bodily movements were uncoordinated. His eyes were glassy, he swayed, and staggered around. The defendant stated he had drank 3 rum and Cokes. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .126 and .124 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 12, 2023	Case: 23-CT-031880	Judge Silverman
Facts:	Police received calls about a reckless driver who was driving crazy and swerving (i.e. the defendant). Another caller responded that the defendant had crashed into a mailbox and left the scene of the accident. Officers conducted a traffic stop and noticed the defendant to have a droopy/drowsy expression, had slow/sluggish movements, appeared unsteady, stumbled, and swayed. His speech was slow at times and he had a red face. The defendant stated he had taken his prescription medicine. There was no odor of alcohol. Believing that he was impaired by drugs, he was asked to perform roadside tests. He performed very poorly and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which came back from the FDLE lab positive for amphetamines. The defendant was also charged with leaving the scene of an accident.
Defense:	The officer's observations of slow/sluggish movements, slow speech, and drowsiness is consistent with someone under the influence of a class of drugs called CNS depressants which would cause one to appear like the defendant. However, he tested positive for an amphetamine (a CNS stimulant) which would have the opposite effect and have inconsistent effects on a person. This was pointed out to the State using the DRE (drug recognition expert matrix chart). The State agreed that the evidence was inconsistent and Dropped the DUI and Dismissed the Leaving the Scene of an Accident charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 12, 2023	Case: 23-CT-007055	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and he admitted to having drank alcohol. He was unsteady and had slow/belabored movements. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew .119 and .109 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 12, 2023	Case: 23-CT-026413	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, he admitted to having consumed a few drinks, and he stumbled. He also braced himself for balance, had slurred speech, and had bloodshot eyes. The defendant was very profane and belligerent towards the police. He then performed poorly on roadside tests, such as the walk and turn and one leg stand. He was subsequently arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 12, 2023	Case: 23-CT-006070	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding (80 mph in a 50 mph zone) and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy/bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He had difficulty locating his documents, used the car for support, admitted to having drank earlier, and had a noticeable sway. The defendant was only able to perform the HGN (eye test) and finger to nose exercises due to some knee injuries. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and he did not appear off balance or unsteady. The State then Dropped the DUI after several negotiations.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 11, 2023	Case: 23-CT-011956	Judge Moses-Stephens
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after he stopped past the stop bar and almost hit a curb making a wide turn. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, heavy eyelids, slurred speech, unsteadiness, and a red face. The defendant stated that he had consumed 3 beers. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .188 and .179 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 10, 2023	Case: 23-CT-005183	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes and she admitted to having consumed two glasses of wine. Her pants were unbuttoned and unzipped, there was fresh vomit on the driver’s door jam, and she was also unsteady. She then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 9, 2023	Case: 22-CT-502880	Judge Gagliardi
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in her car in a bar parking lot. Security officers from the bar called the police since she was unresponsive. When police arrived, the officer went up to the car and made efforts to wake up the defendant. The defendant would not respond to verbal commands, so the office began to shake her until she opened her eyes. He then began to speak with her to determine if she was in distress. Additionally, the officer asked for her driver's license. She was incoherent and her speech was slurred. The officer then noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, her pants were down, and she exhibited a significant lack of balance once out of her car. She performed extremely poorly on roadside tests which were captured on video and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .098 and .099 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the unlawfulness of the initial seizure. In the motion, we alleged that there was no lawful basis for the officer to open her door and ask for a driver's license. Before the officer opened the door he had nothing more than a woman who was sleeping in a car. There were no allegations that she was slumped over the wheel or how long she had been there. The State's response was that the officer was conducting a welfare check to determine if the defendant was either sick or injured. Nonetheless, the officer never called fire rescue. In addition, the officer asked for the defendant's driver's license which makes clear that he was never genuinely concerned about her wellbeing. The law in Florida makes clear that once the officer asked for the defendant's driver's license she was detained. On the morning of the motion the State conceded the motion.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 3, 2023	Case: 23-CT-005697	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for repeatedly weaving from side to side, driving under the speed limit, and also drifting over the lane markers. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She then performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Many observations on the field sobriety tests were contradicted by the video tape.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 3, 2023	Case: 23-CT-006122	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in her car in the middle of the road. The gear shift was in drive and her foot was on the brake. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and she admitted to having consumed alcohol. On tape, her speech was very slurred. She then refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 3, 2023	Case: 23-CT-008126	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving, fluctuating speeds, and following too closely. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and he appeared unsteady. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .125 and .123 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The firm pointed out to the State that on three separate occasions interferent was detected on the breath machine when the defendant blew just prior to getting the .125 and .123. Thus, the breath test results may have been compromised by unknown interferent.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 28, 2023	Case: AGR3VYE	Judge Lawhorne
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbling speech, and bloodshot eyes. He was also sweating, unsteady, swaying, and staggering. The defendant admitted to having consumed two beers. After performing various field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test), he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI arrest.
Defense:	The firm pointed out to the State that almost everything the officer wrote was contradicted by the videotape. His speech was not mumbled, he was not off balance or unsteady, and he did much better on the field sobriety tests than as written. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 27, 2023	Case: 23-CT-028195	Judge T. Brown
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light and not wearing a seat belt. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glossy/bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He also appeared confused and stated he had drank two beers. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test) and then refused all further roadside tests. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 27, 2023	Case: 23-CT-026155	Judge T. Brown
Facts:	The defendant was observed staggering towards her car after exiting a bar. The defendant had her keys in her hand and then stepped into her car. Officers immediately requested her to step out. The observed her stagger, lean against the car for balance, and then they smelled an odor of alcohol. The also observed glassy eyes, dilated pupils, mumbling speech, and a flushed face. She performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	There was no reasonable suspicion of a crime justifying ordering her out of her car. Officers actually let her get into her car and had no clue why she was staggering. All the DUI observations were made after they illegally ordered her out of the car. Also, she was not in actual physical control because she had no "capability" to operate the car as she tossed the keys onto her passenger seat and the offices didn't even give her a chance to start the car.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 27, 2023	Case: 23-CT-006133	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was subsequently arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	On video tape, the defendant did not appear off balance or unsteady prior to roadside tests and his speech was not slurred. We also pointed out to the State that he had difficulty with the walk and turn and one leg stand exercises because he is 6 foot 4 and well over 230 pounds,. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 15, 2023	Case: 23-CT-007931	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after the officer observed her strike two curbs and failing to maintain a single lane. Once stopped, he did not smell any alcohol, but noticed glassy eyes, slow/belabored movements, unsteadiness, and she admitted to taking her prescribed medications. Believing she was impaired by drugs, she then performed various field sobriety tests such as HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was then arrested for DUI and later refused a urine test.
Defense:	The defendant admitted to taking two medications. One was a controlled substance, and one was not. The statement about the controlled substance was made in violation of her Miranda rights after she was arrested, in custody, and in the back of the police car. That drug she had admitted to taking was in a class of controlled substances called CNS Stimulants. The officer's observations of slow/belabored movements, as well as getting HGN (i.e. nystagmus in her eyes), was inconsistent with one who is under the influence of a stimulants. On the other hand, it would be consistent with the exact opposite, CNS Depressants. The State agreed that her statement was taken unlawfully. Without that statement, the State could not prove by which specific controlled substance was allegedly impairing the defendant pursuant to Florida Statute 316.193 (the DUI statute). The State then Dismissed the DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

←45 / 196→

Obtain Immediate Legal Help

To save your license, you must take action within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case today by calling (645) 400-6504 or fill out the form here.

Contact Us Today