Skip to main content

Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

Serving Miami-Dade and the Florida Keys

Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays

645-400-6504

Results

Aug 27, 2026 Case: AL8GUME Judge Lawhorne
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She had a sway to her stance and exhibited mood changes. According to the officer, she performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), finger to nose, estimation of 30 seconds, walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 27, 2026 Case: AM07ESE Judge Lawhorne
Facts: Police found the defendant stopped on a bridge as his car was disabled. Officers did not notice an odor of alcohol, but did observe slurred speech, slow motor skills, and he stated that he had taken pain medications. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later provided a urine sample which revealed positive results for numerous controlled substances.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 27, 2026 Case: 26-CT-003809 Judge Smith
Facts: The defendant was stopped for illegal tint, being stopped at an intersection without moving and then driving 2-3 miles per hour. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, red/glossy eyes, and he appeared unsteady on his feet. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .129 and .131 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 27, 2026 Case: 26-CT-001056 Judge Gould
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding, driving at inconsistent speeds, and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot/watery eyes. Her balance was very poor and she stumbled. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later blew a .140 and .138 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 26-CT-024437 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. His movements were slow and lethargic, and he had to lean against the car for balance. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test) and he refused to perform any other roadside tests. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 25-CT-055958 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was involved in a traffic crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, he was belligerent and vulgar, he appeared clumsy, and had slurred speech. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: In conversations with the prosecutor, we pointed out that the defendant was not the at fault driver. The other driver pulled out in him and failed to yield. In addition, it was discussed as to why the officer was asking for physical field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn and one leg stand when the defendant's air bags deployed and his neck was nearly broke.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 25-CT-036419 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was found passed out in a Checkers drive thru. Upon awakening him, the officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy/watery eyes, mumbled speech, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was his Second DUI.
Defense: On tape, his speech was not mumbled and did not appear unsteady. The video contradicted the police reports. After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the Second DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 26-CT-021300 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slow speech, and red eyes. According to the officer, she performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 26-MM-015504 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding (81 mph in a 45 mph zone) and crossing over the double yellow line. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a 12 pack of beer on the floorboard, slightly slurred speech, and he admitted to having consumed two beers. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .090 and .087 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 25, 2026 Case: 25-CT-055024 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and delayed responses to questions. His clothing was untidy and he appeared disheveled. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was his Third DUI.
Defense: On tape, the officers had no idea how to conduct a DUI investigation. They were asking for a breath test prior arrest. In Florida, one can only be requested to perform a breath test after the arrest for DUI. In addition, the officers were turning their body worn cameras off during the DUI investigation. No one knows why. After pretrial discussions, the State Dropped his Third DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 24, 2026 Case: 26-CT-023188 Judge Koenig
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and not maintain his lane. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, confused speech, and red/glassy eyes. He also had a fixed gaze, a flushed face, and his movements were slow. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: On tape, the defendant was not failing to maintain his lane. In addition, his movements were not slow at all. His performance on the field sobriety tests, captured on video tape, was much better than as described in the totally exaggerated police reports. After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 21, 2026 Case: 25-CT-004943 Judge Gould
Facts: The defendant was involved in a two vehicle traffic crash, whereby the defendant's vehicle rolled over. When officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol and glassy/watery eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn exercises, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant was transported to the hospital and never asked for a breath test.
Defense: Prior to trial, it was pointed out to the State that the defendant was not the at fault driver. The other driver pulled out on the highway without lights and pulled out in front of him causing his car to rollover. Yet, the officer still had the defendant perform physical exercises like the one leg stand and walk and turn after just being involved in a roll over crash. Any impairment that he exhibited could have as easily been attributed to the crash versus alcohol. The firm announced ready for trial and prior to trial after negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 20, 2026 Case: 26-CT-500680 Judge Paluck
Facts: The defendant was stopped for impeding traffic. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn exercises, he was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .098 and .097 in the breath machine.
Defense: The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the State about the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 19, 2026 Case: 26-CT-002276 Judge Leaf
Facts: The defendant was stopped for swerving all over lane markers. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and constricted pupils. The defendant stated that he had consumed two beers. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later blew a .203 and .199 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 18, 2026 Case: 26-CT-022613 Judge T. Brown
Facts: The defendant crashed his car into multiple parked vehicles. He was initially detained by the civilians in the neighborhood before police arrived. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, he was unable to form a sentence, and could barely walk on his own. The defendant stated something incoherent about mushrooms and marijuana. He refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 17, 2026 Case: 26-CT-005861 Judge Castor
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, his speech was slurred/slow and his movements were slow and deliberate. The defendant stated that he had consumed several vodka drinks. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, estimation of 30 seconds, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later blew a .125 and .122 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 17, 2026 Case: 25-CT-002524 Judge Hendricks
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a sideswipe crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and mumbled/slurred speech. He was repeating himself and he also exhibited balance issues (swayed and staggered). According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense: The defendant appeared impaired on tape. However, when the officer was demonstrating the walk and turn, he stumbled and said "whoopsie." We used this to our advantage by telling the prosecutor that if his cop can't even do it, then how is our client supposed to. The State agreed and Dropped his Third DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 14, 2026 Case: 25-CF-005648 Judge K. Fernandez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slow slurred speech, red eyes, and both an odor of alcohol and marijuana. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. The defendant was also charged with felony possession of marijuana. In addition, this was his Third DUI within ten years and he was charged with Felony DUI.
Defense: The firm took pretrial depositions of all the officers on scene. At the depositions, officers were contradicting each other and could not explain why the defendant was immediately handcuffed and detained prior to any investigation. It was a bunch of drugs cops who truly had no idea what they were doing and running amuck. Their credibility was called into question. After the depos, the State Dropped the Felony DUI to a reckless driving and also amended the felony possession of marijuana charge to a misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia charge. The defendant received no probation and his only penalty was to pay court costs and a fine.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 14, 2026 Case: 26-CT-004624 Judge Doyle
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and droopy eyelids. The defendant stated that he had consumed two beers. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Aug 13, 2026 Case: 26-CT-000228 Judge Powell
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. The defendant was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.

Obtain Immediate Legal Help

To save your license, you must take action within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case today by calling (645) 400-6504 or fill out the form here.

Contact Us Today

By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Parks & Braxton, PA at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance.