Results

Sep 11, 2025	Case: AJF4VVE	Judge Szematowicz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slow/mumbled speech, a dazed expression, and glassy/watery eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), finger to nose, walk and turn, and one legs and exercises, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 11, 2025	Case: 25-CT-007002	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for an expired tag. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slow/slurred speech, and lethargic actions. The defendant denied drinking any alcohol and also handed the cop a credit card instead of his license. The defendant refused to do any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 11, 2025	Case: 25-CT-007866	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and red/bloodshot eyes. His movements were lethargic and he appeared unsteady. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test.
Defense:	We pointed out to the State, that on the on video tape, none of the defendant's normal faculties were impaired. After conversations with the State about the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-026456	Judge Garagozlo
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving in the bicycle lane and speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, slow dexterity, unsteadiness, and slurred speech. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .153 and .140 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-003151	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash whereby he was driving a semi-truck. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and watery/glassy eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The trooper wrote a very vague and poorly written report, most likely assuming we can see all the specifics the field sobriety tests on his dash cam. However, the police department could not retrieve the footage. After the prosecutor tried several times and could not locate the video, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-501378	Judge George
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and swerving in and out of his lane on three occasions. Officer noticed an odor of alcohol, he fumbled with his documents, had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and poor coordination. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one legs stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	On tape, he had no coordination issues and his speech was normal. Many observations that were written in the police reports, relating to the field sobriety tests, were contradicted by the video. Prior to the trial date, we had negotiations with the prosecutor and they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-501332	Judge Paluck
Facts:	The defendant crashed his car and when police arrived it was upside down in the woods. After the defendant crawled out of his car, officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, dilated pupils, and bloodshot eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand, and finger to nose exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Even after being involved in a rollover crash, on tape, the defendant's speech was normal, he had no balance issues, was polite, and seemed responsive and coherent. He performed much better on the field sobriety tests than as described in the reports. After conversations with the State before the trial date, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2025	Case: 24-CT-008488	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in his car as it rested against a pole. Officers got the defendant to wake up and noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and an unsteady gait. He admitted to having consumed two-three beers. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2025	Case: 25-CT-003999	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving eastbound in the westbound lane. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and he admitted to having drank two beers. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He then blew a .095 and .091 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2025	Case: 25-CT-003862	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving in and out of his lane and driving in the bike lane. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he admitted to having drank vodka. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The officer's credibility was called into question. On tape, he kept calling the defendant "Michael" which is not the defendant's name. The defendant kept correcting him by stating, "that is not my name." The State Dropped the DUI after negotiations.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Sep 3, 2025	Case: 25-CT-003703	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, a blank/dazed stare, fumbling fingers, and poor coordination. He admitted drinking in one beer, appeared confused, had slow/deliberate movements, and a lethargic appearance. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant was not confused, he had good coordination, and did not move slow or deliberate. He also did not appear lethargic. Every observation the officer wrote in his reports was contradicted by the video tape. After conversations with the State, they Dismissed the DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Aug 28, 2025	Case: 25-CT-004941	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in her can in the middle of the road. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, red/watery eyes, and she also swayed and stumbled. After performing the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn exercises, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .155 and .154 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 28, 2025	Case: 25-CT-005459	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, glossy eyes, unsteady balance, and the defendant admitted to having consumed alcohol. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .122 and .119 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After pretrial conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 28, 2025	Case: 25-CT-003704	Judge Rich
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane, stopping past a stop bar at a red light, and accelerating unusually fast. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, fumbling fingers, glassy eyes, and unsteady balance. The defendant admitted to having consumed alcohol at a work event. He performed poorly on the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After pretrial negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2025	Case: 25-CT-005455	Judge Valkenburg
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after his car jumped over the curb at a Chick fil-A and almost hit a police car. Officers approached the defendant's car and he was passed out. Upon awakening him, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He also had decreased motor skills. After performing poorly on the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 21, 2025	Case: ALE824E	Judge Szematowicz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a flashing red light and almost hitting a cop. The officer pulled the defendant over and went up to his car. Right off the bat, the officer calls in "signal one" (code for DUI). The officer says he noticed a marijuana shaker on the floorboard. The officer observed the defendant to have red/glassy eyes, slow/raspy speech, lethargic movements, and there was no odor of alcohol. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a urine test.
Defense:	The officer had no basis to call in signal one (code for DUI) as he hadn't even made any observations. It was obvious he was aggravated the defendant had almost cut him off. However, that was not true, because on tape, the defendant hadn't even come close to the officer when he ran the flashing red. In fact, the defendant realized he had went past it then stopped short. Also, there were no pictures taken nor any discussion of any marijuana shaker, if it even existed to begin with. The officer never asked the defendant one question such as: where are you coming from, have you taken drugs, gave you been drinking (Nothing). The firm sent a letter requesting a dismissal of the DUI and the State agreed and they Dismissed the DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Aug 21, 2025	Case: AJF4T1E	Judge Dittmer
Facts:	The defendant was found by police in his car parked sideways and across multiple parking spaces. When officers went up to talk to him, they noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He swayed and stumbled while standing outside the car. The defendant performed poorly on the walk and turn and one leg stand exercises. The defendant couldn't perform the HGN (eye test), because kept moving his head. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 21, 2025	Case: AJ8ZRWE	Judge Lawhorne
Facts:	The defendant drove over a curb, struck a pedestrian crossing sign, and then struck a light pole. The car skidded in the grass and then turned upright. There was no odor of alcohol, but officers noticed droopy eyelids, swaying, unsteadiness, he was very uncooperative/combative. His speech was mumbled and incoherent, as well. EMS arrived and had to strap him down and sedate him. He was then taken to the hospital for treatment. The police charged him with DUI and he later provided a urine sample. The defendant's urine tested positive for midazolam ( a sedating drug used in hospitals) and also evidence of marijuana.
Defense:	The defendant was definitely impaired and out of his mind on tape. However, the firm got the defendant's EMS records from the scene. They revealed that it was EMS that gave him the drug (midazolam), not as the State originally thought that the defendant used it to get drugged up. We also pointed out that the urinalysis for marijuana was not suitable for analysis and was flawed. The State agreed Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 19, 2025	Case: 25-CT-028011	Judge T. Brown
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for swerving all over the roadway, failing to maintain a single lane, and driving in the emergency lane. There was no odor of alcohol, but officers noticed slurred speech, she was unable to formulate a sentence, and had a flushed face. Her eyes appeared slightly dilated, she stumbled, could not stand up straight, and she needed to lean on her car for balance. The defendant denied taking any drugs, but officers believed she was under the influence of drugs based on their observations. She performed poorly on roadside tests which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath and urine test. Officers found a pill bottle with D-Amphetamine salt combo upon a search incident to arrest.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Aug 18, 2025	Case: 25-CT-025456	Judge Jacobus
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and he stumbled while walking. He also appeared to move slow, appeared unsteady, and staggered. After performing various field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant had no understanding of the instructions on the field sobriety tests. His first language is Vietnamese and speaks very little English. In addition, he did not appear off balance or unsteady on tape, versus what was written in the police reports. After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

←19 / 196→

Obtain Immediate Legal Help

To save your license, you must take action within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case today by calling (645) 400-6504 or fill out the form here.

Contact Us Today