Results

Oct 16, 2025	Case: AI96IUE	Judge Hessinger
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, a sway to his stance, and his overall balance was poor. He was requested to perform the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, finger to nose, and the walk and turn. The defendant was arrested for DIU and later blew a .106 and .103 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 16, 2025	Case: 25-CT-000883	Judge Grey
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and he used his door for support upon exiting the car. He stumbled while walking, swayed while he stood, and had slightly slurred speech. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .138 and .135 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 16, 2025	Case: 25-CT-008567	Judge Scott
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for a welfare check due to her erratic driving pattern. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, red/bloodshot eyes, and her movements were lethargic. She fumbled with her documents and her balance appeared unsteady. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .154 and .149 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 15, 2025	Case: 25-CT-002306	Judge Hitzemann
Facts:	The defendant caused a crash by backing up her car into another vehicle in a parking lot. When officers arrived, they did not smell any alcohol. However, officers believed she was impaired by drugs as the defendant had constricted pupils, looked unsteady, and she appeared very lethargic. She appeared as if she was going to fall asleep several times, had mumbled speech, and was drooling. The defendant was unable to complete any roadside tests for safety reasons. The defendant was taken to hospital for precautions. She was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Under Florida law (Florida DUI statute 316.193), the State must prove that defendant was impaired by a specific controlled or chemical substance. One cannot just be impaired by anything like a bad tomato. Here, they could not prove by what specific substance was allegedly impairing her.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Oct 15, 2025	Case: 25-CT-031904	Judge Ingram
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed and odor of alcohol, slow/slurred speech, and lethargic movements. His eyes were also bloodshot and watery, and he was slow to exit the car. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .128 and .124 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 15, 2025	Case: 25-MM-014457	Judge Ingram
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers arrived on scene and noticed watery eyes, constricted pupils, had a hard time focusing, was sweating heavily, and his legs and arms were shaking uncontrollably. There was no odor of alcohol. Believing he was impaired by drugs, he was requested to perform the field sobriety tests, which consisted of the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, finger to nose, and the walk and turn. He was subsequently arrested for DUI and later refused a urine test. This was the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense:	Under Florida law (Florida DUI statute 316.193), the State must prove that defendant was impaired by a specific controlled or chemical substance. One cannot just be impaired by anything like a bad avocado. Here, they could not prove by what specific substance was allegedly impairing him. Also, the officer who conducted the DUI was in training, being told what to do and reading off a sheet of paper. It was clear that the defendant was a Guinea Pig for her to learn how to do a DUI. The State Dropped the Third DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-010616	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for being passed out in a lane of travel on the interstate highway. Upon awakening him, officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and he admitted to doing three to four shots of tequila. He performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests which consisted of the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .181 and .168 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-010302	Judge Casanova
Facts:	The defendant was found passed out in his car in the middle of an intersection. Upon awakening him, officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was unbalanced. His clothes were disheveled and zipper down. He performed poorly on the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, alphabet, finger to nose, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-010802	Judge Casanova
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and swerving all over the road. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he stated that he had consumed one beer. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .111 and .108 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 9, 2025	Case: 25-CT-009745	Judge Casanova
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving over the double yellow lines multiple times. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests which consisted of the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, finger to nose, alphabet, and walk and turn. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .155 and .149 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 8, 2025	Case: 24-CT-020900	Judge Allen
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for drifting off the road, turning too wide, and driving on the wrong side of the road. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/rambling speech, and bloodshot/glassy eyes. She refused to do any roadside tests and was arrested for DUl. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-008064	Judge Griner
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, an open beer in plain view in the center console, and glassy eyes. He also had dilated pupils and slurred speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests which included the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-006402	Judge Griner
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding, weaving, and driving on the opposite side of the road. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred speech. After performing the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the videotape evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-005324	Judge Eckley-Moulder
Facts:	Police were called to a bar reference a disturbance that the defendant was causing while he was intoxicated. When police arrived, the defendant was driving down the street and he was ordered to stop. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred/mumbled speech, and he denied drinking alcohol. The defendant agreed to perform only the HGN (eye test) and refused to do any other field sobriety tests. He was arrested for DUI and later reused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 8, 2025	Case: 25-CT-007569	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was found sleeping in his car on the grass next to a fence at a boys and girls club. Once the officer got the defendant to wake up, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He also gave inconsistent answers to questions and made unusual statements. He refused to do any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	The officer wrote that he had to knock on the window numerous times to get the defendant to wake up. That was not true, because on tape, he did two quick knocks and the defendant immediately woke up. He then ordered him to roll down his window. The firm provided signs from the fence line to the State showing that the defendant was legally parked. The officer had no reasonable suspicion to order the defendant to roll his window down. The defendant immediately woke and he could have been innocently sleeping. Since all observations were made after that unlawful command, all the evidence would have been thrown out. The State agreed and DIsmissed his Second DUI.
Result:	The DUI was dismissed.

Oct 7, 2025	Case: 25-CT-002043	Judge D. Roberts
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for having an expired registration. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. He was lethargic, swayed, had poor balance, staggered, and stumbled around. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 7, 2025	Case: 24-019540MU10A	Judge Evans
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving the wrong way towards oncoming traffic. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. The officers also observed beer cans in the vehicle. The defendant was asked to exit the car whereby the officer observed unsteadiness. The defendant originally refused to perform field sobriety tests, but agreed once the officers placed him in handcuffs. He performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand, finger to nose exercises, as well as the modified Rhomberg (time estimation test). The video showed that on the walk and turn test the defendant failed to walk heel to toe and stumbled on the turn. On the one leg stand the defendant dropped his foot a few times. On the finger to nose the defendant used his pad rather than the tip of his finger when touching his nose. The defendant was arrested for DUI and refused to submit to a breath test.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton announced ready for trial. While the defendant did not perform perfectly on the field sobriety exercises, it was clear that the officer both exaggerated and mischaracterized the defendant's performance. As far as the refusal to submit to a breath test, the defendant was already under arrest. He wasn't going to be let go if he provided a breath test regardless of the results. In addition, it seemed obvious from the video that the defendant was refusing a breath test not because he was trying to conceal the results, but rather because he did not trust the police. The state dropped the DUI just as the jury was coming in on the morning of trial.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 7, 2025	Case: 24-163487MU10A	Judge Levy
Facts:	The defendant hit the side of the curb causing damage to her tires. Road patrol came on scene, made observations of the defendant and called 911. Road patrol told dispatch that the defendant did not look right and was possibly impaired. The officers arrived on scene and made observations consistent with impairment. Specifically, the defendant was extremely unsteady on video, almost falling over several times. In addition, the defendant admitted to taking a controlled substance prior to driving. She was arrested for DUI. She subsequently provided a urine sample which revealed the presence of Lorazepam.
Defense:	The defendant explained on video that she was diagnosed with bronchitis. Parks & Braxton obtained the defendant's medical records which supported her claim that she was sick. In addition, bronchitis affects blood cell count which would explain the defendant's extreme unsteadiness on video. The firm subpoenaed the records custodian to admit the medical records in trial. After refusing to deviate for months, the State finally agreed to drop the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 1, 2025	Case: 25-CF-000461	Judge Hamilton
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the road for a long distance and time. Officers noticed and odor of alcohol, he appeared unbalanced, and had slurred speech. His face was flushed, he had watery eyes, and he shuffled though his documents. He refused to do any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. Officers also found a controlled substance and he was charged with felony possession.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI and the felony possession charge was Dismissed.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Oct 1, 2025	Case: 25-CM-002824	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was driving erratically and then was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. His face was flushed and he appeared lethargic and sleepy. He refused to do any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Under Florida law, a breath test cannot be requested until after one is arrested for DUI. Here, the officer asked for a breath test prior to arresting him for DUI. Thus, the refusal to take the breath test would have been excluded from evidence. After negotiations with the State regarding the misinformation of law, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

←17 / 196→

Obtain Immediate Legal Help

To save your license, you must take action within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case today by calling (645) 400-6504 or fill out the form here.

Contact Us Today