-
Mar 3, 2025
Case: 24-CT-055483
Judge Koenig
Facts
The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and his hands were shaking. The defendant exited the car slowly, swayed while standing, and he stated that he had consumed one beer. He performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exorcises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .118 and .117 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 26, 2025
Case: 23-007747MU10A
Judge Francois
Facts
The defendant was stopped for straddling lane markers on the highway. In addition, the defendant was clocked at 85mph in a 65mph zone. The defendant then slowed down in the far right lane to 10mph, eventually stopping in the right lane of traffic. Upon approaching the vehicle, the Trooper observed a strong odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. Upon exiting the car, the officer observed extreme unsteadiness. The Trooper then asked the defendant to perform a series of field sobriety tests. The defendant responded by saying it was up to the Trooper. There was clearly a language barrier between the Trooper and the client. Since the defendant never answered with a clear yes or no answer the Trooper arrested him for DUI. The Trooper then asked for a breath and urine sample. The defendant responded by saying "whatever you want to do just do it." The Trooper took that as a refusal to submit to a breath test.Defense
The evidence made clear that the defendant never specifically responded to the Trooper's requests. In addition, despite the heavy accent it was evident that there was a language barrier between the Trooper and the defendant. These specific issues were raised with the prosecutor. The defendant had his charges reduced to reckless driving with no conviction of any kind on his record.Result
The State dropped the DUI to a reckless driving.
-
Feb 25, 2025
Case: 24-CT-016598
Judge Rich
Facts
The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane and also driving in the middle of two lanes for several blocks. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, unsteady balance, and he admitted to having consumed several mixed drinks. He also had glassy eyes and slurred speech. He performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .182 and .180 in the breath machine.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI. |
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 24, 2025
Case: 24-011987MU10A
Judge Evans
Facts
The defendant was involved in a multiple car accident. Upon arrival, the
officers observed a strong odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech
and a sway while she walked. Multiple witnesses identified the defendant
as the driver involved in the accident. After the crash investigation,
the defendant was informed that the officers were now conducting a DUI
investigation. The defendant refused to participate in either field sobriety
tests or a breath test. She was subsequently arrested for DUI Property
Damage/Personal Injury. After arrest, the officers located 53 Lorazepam
pills in the defendant's purse as well as well as a liquid THC Truelieve syringe.
Defense
Parks & Braxton filed a series of motions challenging the admissibility
of the evidence. Specifically, the firm argued that both the field sobriety
test request and subsequent refusal was unlawful. Next, the firm argued
that the refusal to submit to a breath test was unlawful. The Court agreed,
and excluded any mention that the defendant refused either a breath test
or field sobriety tests. Lastly, Parks & Braxton filed a motion for
Statement of Particulars. Specifically, the motion argued that the prosecutor
needed to state with specificity what substance the defendant was allegedly
impaired by. The prosecutor conceded the motion, and the defendant walked
away with no criminal charges on her record.
|
Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Feb 20, 2025
Case: 24-CT-019480
Judge Damico
Facts
The defendant was found unconscious in his car at an intersection. When
he regained consciousness, his car began to roll forward almost striking
the officers. Officers got the vehicle to stop rolling and upon contact
noticed an odor of alcohol, delayed speech, and bloodshot/glossy eyes.
He then performed various field sobriety tests such as the finger to nose,
count backwards, walk and turn, one leg stand, and the HGN (eye test).
He was subsequently arrested for DUI and later blew a .106 and .104 in
the breath machine.
Defense
After negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 19, 2025
Case: 24-CT-041250
Judge Ingram
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding, swerving, and braking heavily.
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes, and
he stated that he had consumed a couple of drinks. He also appeared unsteady
and walked slowly. After refusing to perform field sobriety tests, he
was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the
defendant, the State Dropped the DUI .
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 19, 2025
Case: 24-CT-045334
Judge Ingram
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving and striking the median wall of
the highway. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech,
and glassy eyes. The defendant staggered, swayed, and had an uneven gait.
The defendant also stated that he had consumed two drinks. He performed
poorly on the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test) exercises
and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 19, 2025
Case: 24-CT-051274
Judge Ingram
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol,
thick/slurred speech, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant
stated he had drank two Long Island Iced Teas. He then performed the HGN
(eye test), estimation of 30 seconds, walk and turn, and one leg stand
exercises. He was then arrested for DUI and later blew a .098 and .095
in the breath machine.
|
Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 13, 2025
Case: 24-CT-014431
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for almost crashing into an officer by violating
his right of way. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech,
and a tired/lethargic balance. He also had poor balance and admitted to
drinking beer. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and
one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he
blew a .110 and .110 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 13, 2025
Case: 24-CT-012747
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding (83mph in a 55mph zone). Officers
noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and slurred speech.
She also appeared unsteady and had fumbling fingers. The defendant refused
to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused
a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.Defense
The firm pointed out to the State prior to trial that the defendant was
not unsteady and had no slurred speech on tape. After negotiations, the
State Dropped her Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 13, 2025
Case: 24-CM-009995
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for making a wide turn and straddling the bike
lane markers. Officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol,
an odor of marijuana, slurred speech, and red/watery eyes. The defendant
only performed the HGN (eye test only). No walk and turn or one leg stand
exercises were conducted due to his belligerent behavior. He was arrested
for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was his Second DUI. He was
also charged with resisting an officer without violence.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI. They also Dismissed
the resisting charge.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 12, 2025
Case: A77GXKE
Judge Vaccaro
Facts
Police got a call about a suspicious vehicle on the side of the highway.
When the trooper arrived, he saw the defendant's vehicle on the side
of the highway. At the same time, the defendant was inside an ambulance
being evaluated by paramedics. The road ranger told the trooper that the
defendant was sitting the driver's seat when he arrived. Officers
made contact with the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, lack of
balance, and thick tongued speech. He also had red/bloodshot eyes. He
refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI.
He later blew a .243 and .235 in the breath machine.
|
Defense
Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the lawfulness
of the arrest. In our motion, we alleged that under Florida Statute 901.15,
when there is no crash, an officer must observe every element of a misdemeanor
crime "in their presence." Here, the officer did not observe
the defendant driving or in actual physical control when he arrived (i.e.,
the first element of a DUI). A civilian road ranger is not an officer
so the fellow officer rule does not apply. After conversations with the
State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dismissed.
Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Feb 11, 2025
Case: 24-CT-011598
Judge Valkenburg
Facts
The defendant was stopped for failing to maintain a single lane (i.e. weaving).
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech and bloodshot eyes.
He also had fumbling fingers and exaggerated movements. Alcohol was found
all over the car. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn,
and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a
.088 and .088 in the breath machine.Defense
Due to the .02 margin of error in the breath machine, we were able to place
both breath results below the legal limit. After several negotiations
regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 10, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502844
Judge Gonzalez
Facts
The defendant crashed his car into a concrete light pole. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a sway to his stance. He also
appeared unsteady, had bloodshot eyes, and dilated pupils. He refused
to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused
a breath test.Defense
EMS was on scene and told the officers that the defendant appeared alert,
oriented, answered all questions appropriately, and had a steady gait.
This was all in contradiction to the officers' observations. In addition,
the arresting officer stated that he conducted a DUI investigation, yet
he never asked the defendant questions such as where he was coming from,
where heading too, or if he even had a drink. He did not ask one question.
After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 10, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502019
Judge Gill
Facts
Police responded to a call regarding a drunk pedestrian (i.e. the defendant)
that was stumbling around the restaurant parking lot trying to find his
car and opening random car doors. Officers arrived and parked behind the
defendant who was now in the driver's seat of his car. Officers knocked
on the window and he rolled it down in response to their command. They
noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady.
The defendant stated he had drank two glasses of wine. He performed very
poorly on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn,
finger to nose, and one leg stand. The walk and turn was actually terminated
due to safety concerns as the defendant almost fell over. He was arrested
for DUI and later blew a .170 and .164 in the breath machine. This was
the defendant's Third DUI.
Defense
Since the caller was anonymous, the officers needed to have some type of
corroboration of the defendant's intoxication in order to lawfully
seize him. Here, the unlawful seizure, without corroboration, was blocking
his car in and ordering him to roll down his window. Officers observed
nothing prior to their actions. After conversations with the State regarding
the actions by police, they Dropped his Third DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 10, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502312
Judge Gonzalez
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving, running a red light, and having
a defective headlight. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a disheveled
look, she appeared confused, and had bloodshot eyes. Alcohol was found
all over the car. The defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety
tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 5, 2025
Case: 24-CT-018325
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. When
officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and
slurred speech. He also appeared confused, had a blank/dazed stare, exhibited
poor balance, and had a lethargic appearance. He admitted to consuming
a couple of beers. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was
arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
|
-
Feb 5, 2025
Case: 24-CT-503201
Judge Paluck
Facts
The defendant was stopped for having tinted windows too dark under Florida
Law. Officers did not smell any alcohol, but noticed bloodshot eyes, an
odor of burnt marijuana coming from the truck, bloodshot/watery eyes,
and white foam on his lips. Believing that he was impaired by drugs, he
was requested to perform field sobriety tests. He then performed the HGN
(eye test), estimation of 30 seconds, finger to nose, walk and turn, and
one leg stand exercises. According to the officer, he performed poorly
and was arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which revealed
positive results from FDLE for marijuana and cocaine. This was the defendant's
Second DUI.Defense
Even though he tested positive for nonprescribed illegal drugs, the State
still must prove that he was impaired. On tape, none of the defendant's
normal faculties were impaired. In fact, the arresting officer can be
heard on tape stating that he needed a DRE (drug recognition expert) to
be sure that the defendant was impaired by the drugs. Well, no DRE was
ever called. So, if the cop is not sure, then how can a jury convict?
After conversations with the State, they Dismissed the Defendant's
Second DUI.Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Feb 5, 2025
Case: 24-CT-012794
Judge Taylor
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving and nearly striking a vehicle. Officers
noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant
stated that he had consumed several drinks prior to driving. After performing
the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was
arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
|
Defense
Many observations before and during the field sobriety tests written by
the officer were contradicted by the video tape. After negotiations, the
State Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 4, 2025
Case: 24-CT-002631CTAXMX
Judge Hitzemann
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an
odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated
that she had consumed five drinks while working in the yard earlier in
the day. The defendant refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested
for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was her Second DUI.
|
Defense
On tape, the defendant's speech sounded normal and not slurred. She
had no balance issues and was very responsive and coherent. After negotiations
with the prosecutor, the State Dropped her Second DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 4, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013096
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving, making a wide turn into oncoming
traffic, and running a stop sign. Officers observed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, and red/glassy eyes. After allegedly performing poorly
on field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and
walk and turn, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the Defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Feb 4, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502497
Judge Swett
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. She then performed the HGN (eye test),
walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and
later refused a breath test.Defense
The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the prosecutor,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 30, 2025
Case: 23-CT-021608
Judge Bonavita
Facts
Police dispatch was notified regarding a sick person passed out in a lane
of travel. EMS found the defendant passed out in the car with it still
in drive. Upon trying to awake the defendant, he tried to drive off with
an EMS worker hanging on for almost 300 feet. Police arrived and noticed
an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He refused to perform
field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
|
Defense
When the DUI officer arrived, the defendant was already detained in handcuffs.
The firm took a pretrial deposition of the first officer on scene. He
stated that he was not the one who cuffed the defendant and did not know
the officer's name who did. The firm then raised an issue with the
State that the defendant was unlawfully detained and cuffed for no reason
as no-one could explain why he was in handcuffs prior the DUI officer's arrival.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 30, 2025
Case: 24-CT-019490
Judge Bonavita
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol
and he stated he had consumed two vodkas. He had bloodshot eyes and slurred
speech. He performed poorly on the field sobriety tests such as the HGN
(eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was arrested for DUI
and later blew a .207 and .194 in the breath machine.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 29, 2025
Case: 24-CT-018256
Judge Griner
Facts
A named citizen called police and stated that the defendant was swerving
all over the road and cut him off. Officers conducted a traffic stop and
observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. After
performing various field sobriety tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk
and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later
blew .189 and .182 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 28, 2025
Case: 24-CT-002821
Judge K. Roberts
Facts
The defendant crashed his car into the center median and then a fence.
There was heavy front-end damage to his car. Officers noticed an odor
of alcohol and watery/glassy eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test),
walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and
later refused a breath test.Defense
Prior to trial, the firm pointed out to the State that on tape, his speech
was normal, he was responsive and coherent, polite, and he had no balance
issues. In addition, his field sobriety tests were much better on tape
than as described in the police reports.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 23, 2025
Case: 24-MM-002668MMAXWS
Judge Grey
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving and failing to maintain her lane.
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and she was unsteady.
She admitted to having drank alcohol and also stumbled. She refused to
perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She refused to
get into the patrol car and was also charged with resisting an officer
without violence. She later refused a breath test.Defense
When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, an officer must
advise them of the adverse consequences for refusing. For example, the
officer must state something like, "I am going to have base my decision
to arrest you on what I have observed so far if you refuse." In addition,
the officer can state to the defendant that their refusal can be used
against them in court. If they do not give any adverse consequences, the
refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer did not give
the defendant any adverse consequences. After negotiations short of trial,
the State Dropped the DUI and she received no conviction on the resisting charge.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 23, 2025
Case: 24-CT-002005CTAXWS
Judge Grey
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving, drifting in his lane, rapidly accelerating,
following too closely, and almost striking another car. Officers observed
an odor of alcohol and he admitted to consuming four beers. He also had
slurred speech, dry mouth, watery eyes, and he made unusual/inconsistent
statements. He was also unsteady and swayed while he stood. After performing
HGN (eye test), the walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was
arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the defendant and the
evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 23, 2025
Case: 24-CT-001584CTAXWS
Judge Swett
Facts
Police were called to a McDonalds regarding drunk patron (i.e., the defendant).
When police arrived, they came into contact with the defendant and smelled
alcohol, observed slurred speech, and had an inability to walk without
swaying. No one could find the keys to the car as the defendant had discarded
them before the cops arrived. In a jail call later to his mother, he stated
that he hid them. Officers went into McDonalds and saw the video of him
behind the wheel. He refused to do roadside tests and was arrested for
DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
Under Florida Statute 901.15, when there is no crash, an officer must observe
every element of a misdemeanor crime "in their presence." Here,
the officer did not observe the defendant driving or in actual physical
control when he arrived (i.e., the first element of a DUI). Watching him
on a McDonalds video is not in his presence. Thus, he did not observe
the first element of DUI so the arrest was unlawful. After conversations
with the State about the legal issue, the DUI was Dropped.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 22, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013306
Judge Taylor
Facts
The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign and weaving. Officers
noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, confusion, and watery eyes.
He admitted to drinking alcohol and had a wristband on from a bar. He
then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises.
He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.Defense
The defendant's field sobriety tests on tape were much better than
as described in the police reports. Also, his speech was not slurred on
tape and he did not appear confused. After conversations with the State,
they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 22, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013268
Judge Taylor
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding and also nearly striking a police
car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech.
He exhibited unsteady balance and admitted to having drank alcohol. He
performed poorly on the roadside tests such as the walk and turn and one
leg stand. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .182 and .175 in the
breath machine.Defense
After negotiations regarding the defendant and evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 22, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013463
Judge Taylor
Facts
The defendant drove up to officers as they were on an unrelated traffic
stop/crash scene. Officers approached him and noticed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also urinated on himself and had
an unsteady stance. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested
for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's
Second DUI.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence,
they Dropped his Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 22, 2025
Case: 24-CT-011540
Judge Bagge-Hernandez
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end traffic crash. Witnesses
stated that she was driving at a high rate of speed and cutting across
lanes of traffic prior to the accident. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, and watery eyes. After performing the HGN (eye test),
walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, she was arrested for DUI.
She later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013299
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped after he was weaving and nearly struck a concrete
barrier. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, several open beer bottles
in the cabin of the truck, and bloodshot eyes. His speech was slurred
and he was unable to answer basic questions. He refused to perform field
sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After several negotiations regarding the case, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-010797
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving, running a stop sign, and speeding.
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/slow speech, and glassy eyes.
He provided incorrect paperwork, swayed while he stood, and stated he
had consumed three alcoholic beverages. After performing the HGN (eye
tests), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested for
DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-011792
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a front bumper to front bumper
crash because he was driving the wrong way. Officers noticed an odor of
alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed various
roadside tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg
stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
This was the defendant Second DUI.Defense
Many observations written in the reports were contradicted by the video.
After negotiations, the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013276
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for making an illegal turn. The officer noticed
an odor of alcohol, a tired/lethargic appearance, and slurred speech.
He also had a blank/dazed stare, slow/deliberate movements, and watery
eyes. He performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
He later blew a .147 and .147 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-011420
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for crossing over the double yellow lane divider.
When running her tag, she had a suspended driver's license. Officers
observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. During
field sobriety tests, she was acting in a bizarre fashion by doing dance
moves and air squats. She performed poorly and was arrested for DUI. She
later refused a breath test.
Defense
After conversations about the case just prior to trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-400419
Judge D. Johnson
Facts
The defendant was pulling out of a parking lot. Before pulling out, he
reversed and backed up into a police car. Once out the car, the officer
had him kneel on the ground. Due the defendant's "erratic behavior,"
the officer called for other officers and handcuffed him. Once other officers
arrived, he was then placed in the back of patrol car while still cuffed.
He was in the back seat cuffed for well over 30 minutes until a DUI officer
arrived. Officers noticed an odor alcohol, he admitted to having drank
two beers and taking illegal drugs, and he was argumentative. His speech
was confused and rapid. He performed poorly on all the field sobriety
tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .137 and .136 in the breath machine.Defense
The firm filed a pretrial motion to suppress all the evidence. In our motion,
we alleged that the defendant was illegally being seized by being cuffed
not only from the beginning, but also while cuffed in the back of a patrol
car for over 30 minutes without probable cause to believe that he was
DUI. On video, the DUI officer arrived and even asked why was he in the
back of the patrol car cuffed. The Judge agreed that he was unlawfully
seized, granted the motion, and threw out all the evidence. The State
then Dropped the DUI to a civil infraction of careless driving. No points,
no conviction, and all the defendant had to do was pay a fine.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-047530
Judge Skinner
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of
alcohol, mumbling speech, and bloodshot eyes. He appeared clumsy, swayed
while he stood, and his movements were slow. The defendant stated that
he had consumed multiple shots of vodka and drank beers. He performed
very poorly roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .204
and .200 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 21, 2025
Case: 24-CT-045137
Judge Skinner
Facts
Police were called to a hospital parking lot due to a male being passed
out in his car with the engine running. The officer arrived and noticed
the defendant slumped over the wheel. The officer got the defendant out
of the car to check on his well-being. He noticed an odor of alcohol,
glassy eyes, and pinpoint pupils. He was unsure, confused, and was very
unsteady. He almost fell over and officers had to grab him to keep him
from falling. The defendant stated he "was drunk as fuck." No
roadside tests were conducted and he was arrested for DUI. He later blew
a .313 and .310 in the breath machine (almost 4 times the legal limit).Defense
The firm provided mitigation evidence to the State regarding the defendant.
After reviewing the mitigation documents and many conversations with the
prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 14, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502689
Judge George
Facts
The defendant was stopped for making an illegal U-turn. Officers observed
an odor of alcohol, an odor of marijuana, slurred speech, and bloodshot
eyes. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg
stand exercises. He was then arrested for DUI.
Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 14, 2025
Case: 24-CT-002096
Judge
Facts
The defendant was alleged to have been the at fault driver in a traffic
crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, swaying, and
staggering. His speech was slurred and he appear disheveled. He performed
very poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later
refused a breath test.Defense
On video, the defendant was blaming his girlfriend as being the driver
and she was blaming him for being the driver. The civilian witnesses could
not make a positive ID who was driving at the time of the crash. The officers
tried to pull video from the WAWA but couldn't. After negotiations,
the State could not prove who was driving at the time of the crash and
they Dismissed the DUI.Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Jan 10, 2025
Case: 24-CT-003245
Judge Gould
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, sluggish speech, a flushed face, droopy/glassy eye
lids, and he admitted to having consumed a beer and one Jack Daniels after
playing golf. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one
leg stand, and finger to nose exercises. He was then arrested for DUI
and later refused a breath test.Defense
The firm announced ready for trial. Just prior to the trial date, we pointed
out to the State that the officer had the defendant, who is 71 years old,
do the walk and turn and one leg stand, even though he told them on tape
he had two hip replacements and ankle/foot issues. In addition, his speech
was normal on tape and not sluggish, he was not off balance, totally responsive
and coherent, and very polite. The firm had also listed the three witnesses
who he had played golf with were ready to testify that the defendant was
not impaired when he left the golf club just prior to the crash. The State
Dropped the DUI a few days before the trial date.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CT-502647
Judge Paluck
Facts
The defendant was involved in a traffic crash where she was found to not
be at fault. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and
slurred speech. She performed poorly on field sobriety tests such as HGN
(eye test), walk and turn, and the one leg stand, and was arrested for
DUI. She later blew a .125 and .119 in the breath machine.
|
Defense
The firm provided mitigating evidence to the State regarding the defendant
and they Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CM-008904
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding, weaving within his lane, and being
over the lane markers. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, confusion,
bloodshot eyes, and he admitting to drinking alcohol. The defendant refused
to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused
a breath test.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CT-012609
Judge Rich
Facts
The defendant was stopped after traveling the wrong way on a one-way street.
Officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot/glassy
eyes. He was unsteady and had a wristband on from a bar. He performed
various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a
.101 and .098 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense
On tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and he was not unsteady.
Many observations written in the police reports were contradicted by the
video tape. In addition, due the .02 margin of error in the breath machine,
we are able to place one of his breath results under the legal limit.
The State Dropped his Second DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CT-012400
Judge Rich
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol,
glassy eyes, and slurred speech. He appeared unsteady and stated that
he had consumed several drinks at a club. He performed poorly on roadside
tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .172 and .167 in the breath machine.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CT-013684
Judge Rich
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving and straddling lane markers. Officers
noticed an odor of alcohol, red/glassy eyes and he denied drinking alcohol.
According to the officer, he performed poorly on the field sobriety tests
and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
Many observations written about the defendant's performance on the
roadside tests were exaggerated as compared to the video tape. After negotiations,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 9, 2025
Case: 24-CT-012800
Judge Rich
Facts
Facts:
|
A call was made that the defendant appeared intoxicated at a convenience
store. Officers found the defendant and observed an odor of alcohol, very
slurred speech, and he was disoriented. He had bloodshot eyes and appeared
unsteady. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
|
Defense
When officers located the defendant in the parking lot, they did not observe
an indicators of intoxication. When they pulled up they turned their overhead
lights on a blocked him in. Thus, the firm raised the issue with the State
that there was an unlawful detention because one cannot feel free to leave
when blocked in by a police car with lights on. The State Agreed and Dropped
his Second DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 24-CT-042515
Judge T. Brown
Facts
The defendant crashed his vehicle into a light pole. Officers noticed an
odor of alcohol, watery eyes, slurred speech, and a flushed face. The
defendant performed very poorly on field sobriety tests. He also admitted
on video tape to being intoxicated. He was arrested for DUI and later
blew a .161 and .160 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations and providing mitigating evidence to the State, they
Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 24-CT-042502
Judge T. Brown
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, and slow/lethargic movements. He also appeared clumsy
and had bloodshot eyes. He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and
was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 24-CT-042259
Judge Koenig
Facts
Police were called to do a welfare check on the defendant as the defendant's
ex-boyfriend stated she was going to do harm to herself. Officers responded
and found the defendant in the driver's seat. They observed an odor
of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. An open container of wine
was found in the front seat. She refused to perform field sobriety tests
and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath. This was the defendant's
Third DUI.Defense
After discussions with State about the defendant and the underlying basis
of welfare check call, the State Dropped the defendant's Third DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 24-CT-052043
Judge Musselman
Facts
Officers were called reference a suicidal person (i.e. the defendant).
They found the defendant sitting in his running truck trying to get though
a security gate. He had and odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes,
and slight confusion answering questions. He also staggered and swayed.
He refused to get out of the car and was extracted. He refused to perform
field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State, about the defendant and the evidence,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 24-CT-044719
Judge Musselman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol,
mumbled speech, and a fixed gaze. She stated she had consumed two beers,
swayed while she stood, and she used the car for balance. After performing
the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, she was
arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense
After several negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the
defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 8, 2025
Case: 23-CT-057754
Judge Musselman
Facts
Officers were called to a single motorcycle accident to which the defendant
was driving. The defendant was taken to the hospital before officers arrived.
After speaking to the witness who saw the crash and identified the defendant
as the driver, officers then went to the hospital. They observed an odor
of alcohol and he stated he had drank a few beers. No field sobriety tests
were conducted due to him being in the hospital. Later on, the State attempted
get his medical blood from the hospital. It revealed an alcohol level
almost three times the legal limit( i.e. .213). He was then charged by
the State with DUI.Defense
After several conversations with the State regarding the defendant and
the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 7, 2025
Case: 24-CT-009580
Judge Valkenburg
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol,
red/glassy eyes, and he had a bracelet on his wrist from a bar. The defendant
was argumentative, uncooperative, and refused to get out the car. He was
eventually "escorted" out the car by police. He refused to perform
any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a
breath test.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 7, 2025
Case: 24-CT-010712
Judge Valkenburg
Facts
The defendant was stopped for having a tag not assigned to his car. Officer
noticed an odor of alcohol, eye lid tremors, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant
stated he had just smoked pot earlier in the night. After performing the
HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was arrested
for DUI. He later provided a urine sample, which after being tested at
FDLE, was positive for marijuana.Defense
The defendant’s performance on the field sobriety tests was much
better on video than as described by the officer in the reports. After
conversations with the State, they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Jan 6, 2025
Case: 24-CT-002798
Judge Burns
Facts
The defendant's daughter called police stating that her mother (i.e.
the defendant) was highly intoxicated and afraid she may hurt herself.
Officers located the vehicle on the interstate and saw her weaving all
over the road. Once stopped, officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery
eyes, her speech was incoherent/slurred, and she could not focus. She
swayed, staggered, and was very off balance. She was only able to safely
perform the HGN (eye test) and then was arrested for DUI. She later blew
a .137 and .134 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Second DUI.Defense
The firm provided mitigating evidence to the State regarding the defendant
and after negotiations, the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 19, 2024
Case: 24-CT-001459
Judge B. Jo Bell
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving all over. Officers observed an odor
of alcohol, mumbled speech, and bloodshot eyes. He also appeared unsteady
on his feet. The defendant performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn,
and one leg stand exercises. He was subsequently arrested for DUI and
later blew a .091 and .088 in the breath machine.
|
Defense
When they do the monthly maintenance on the breath machines, they use various
solutions to test the machine for alcohol. Those solutions must be with
certain ranges. If the solutions are out of range, the machine should
not pass. Here, the solutions were out of range, yet they still passed
the machine during inspection. This was brought to the State's attention.
After negotiations, they Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 18, 2024
Case: 24-CT-011951
Judge Taylor
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/watery eyes, and slurred/thick tongued speech.
He was lethargic and exhibited unstable balance. The defendant refused
to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a
breath test.
Defense
On tape, the defendant's speech was normal, he was not unstable, and
did not appear lethargic at all. Everything that the officer wrote was
contradicted by the video tape. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-008095
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving all over the road. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He performed poorly
on the field sobriety tests, which included the walk and turn, one leg
stand, and HGN (eye test). He was arrested for DUI and later refused a
breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-005660
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was involved in a crash whereby he backed into a pedestrian
pushing a shopping cart in a Publix parking lot. Officers noticed an odor
of alcohol, slurred speech, and droopy eyelids. He also swayed while he
stood. After performing the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg
stand exercises, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .133 and .130
in the breath machine.Defense
On tape, the initial officer can be heard saying he didn't smell any
alcohol, yet the defendant was being detained for a long time until a
DUI officer arrived. We put forth that the defendant was being detained
unlawfully without evidence that he was actually DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-009426
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding, weaving, and stopping over a stop
bar at a red light. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes,
and slurred speech. He also had a wristband on from a bar. After performing
poorly on field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew
a .166 and .164 in the breath machine.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-008355
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was stopped after an officer observed him make a last second
turn at a high rate of speed causing the defendant to take corrective
action to regain control of the car. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, glassy eyes, and he stated that he had consumed a whiskey/ginger.
He then performed the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn
exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense
The police reports were contradicted by the video tape. The defendant performed
much better on the field sobriety tests on tape than as described in the
police reports. In addition, his speech was not slurred on tape.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-042269
Judge Koenig
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving and continuously riding on the white
line on the right-hand shoulder. The officer observed an odor of alcohol,
slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and she fumbled with her documents. After
performing various field sobriety tests, she was arrested for DUI. She
later blew a .101 and .100 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-049301
Judge Ingram
Facts
An officer heard the sounds of tires on gravel and screeching behind a
Church and then saw the defendant pull out. He then observed the defendant
braking excessively. Upon stopping the defendant, the officer noticed
an odor of alcohol and slurred/mumbled speech. The defendant refused to
perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused
a breath test.Defense
During negotiations with the State, we pointed out that there was no legal
basis to stop the defendant, as there was no infractions and no reasonable
suspicion to believe that he was impaired. In addition, the officer never
even placed the defendant in front of the dash camera prior to arresting
him. Additionally, one could hear the defendant off camera and his speech
sounded perfectly normal. There was a complete lack of evidence and the
State Dismissed the DUI.Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-029763
Judge Koenig
Facts
The defendant crashed his car and it ended up in a ditch. The vehicle was
totally destroyed. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes,
and he appeared unsteady. He appeared drowsy, disoriented, and clumsy.
He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI.
He later refused a breath test.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-MM-023256
Judge Jacobus
Facts
The defendant was so intoxicated that he called the police saying he was
being battered by staff members at a bar. When police arrived, the bouncers
told the cops that the defendant consumed several drinks and was told
not to drive. The police tried to stop the defendant, but he drove off,
ran a stop sign, and turned off all his lights to avoid detection. When
they eventually got him stopped, they smelled alcohol, noticed a flushed
face, he had slurred speech, and he appeared clumsy. He also stumbled,
swayed, and staggered. He performed very poorly on roadside tests and
was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. He was also charged
with resisting an officer without violence for not wanting to be cuffed
or get into the police car.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and providing
them mitigation on behalf of the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI
and they also Dismissed the Resisting charge.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-0435503
Judge Taylor
Facts
A call went out about a possible intoxicated driver. Officers spoke with
the complainant and they stated that the was in the bar, appeared intoxicated,
buying beer, and ordering takeout. The officer saw the defendant walk
out to his car and appear very unsteady. He watched him pull out and then
the defendant ran a stop sign. Upon contact the officer observed an odor
of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. He appeared confused, clumsy,
and disheveled. After performing poorly on the field sobriety tests, he
was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .232 and .228 in the breath machine.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-041430
Judge Jacobus
Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving with no headlights and running a
red light. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, glassy/bloodshot eyes,
and he appeared unsteady. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and
turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused
a breath test.Defense
On tape, the defendant’s speech was normal, he was not unsteady,
appeared responsive and coherent, and had no balance issues. He performed
very well on the roadside tests on tape versus what was written. After
conversations with the State, they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-039544
Judge Jacobus
Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving under the speed limit and also failing
to maintain a single lane. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred
speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant stated that he had consumed some
drinks. After performing various roadside tests such and the walk and
turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test), he was arrested for DUI. He later
blew a .108 and .097 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 12, 2024
Case: 24-MM-039521
Judge Baker
Facts
The defendant was found by police slumped over the wheel of her car and
unconscious. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and her
movements were slow. The defendant started to walk away and refused to
listen. She was continually yelling and was uncooperative. She was handcuffed
and charged with DUI and resisting an officer without violence. She later
refused a breath test.
|
Defense
After several conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the
defendant, the State Dropped the DUI and Dismissed the resisting charge.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: 24-CT-007527
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the roadway. Once stopped,
the officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech.
Once out of the car, she appeared unsteady. She refused to perform any
field sobriety tests other than HGN (eye test). She was arrested for DUI.
The defendant had a CDL license and later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the defendant and the evidence,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: 24-CT-008934
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for running two stop signs. Officers observed
an odor of alcohol, slow/lethargic movements, and red/glassy eyes. His
speech was also slurred. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test)
and refused to perform any other roadside tests. He was arrested for DUI
and later refused a breath test.Defense
On tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and he did not move
slow or lethargically. After pointing this out to the State, along with
a lack of other evidence of impairment, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: 24-CT-005390
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for swerving all over the road. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, unsteadiness, and glassy eyes. She refused to perform
field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.Defense
Due to a lack of probable cause to arrest based on the video tape evidence,
the State Dropped the DUI after negotiations.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: A77HLSE
Judge Vaccaro
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a traffic crash whereby he slammed
into a light pole. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol and marijuana.
His eyes were glassy and bloodshot and he exhibited slurred speech. The
defendant performed very poorly on the walk and turn and one leg stand
exercises and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State, we pointed out that any impairment
observed could have just as easily been attributed to a bad crash versus
alcohol. After negotiations with the State, they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: 24-CT-004908
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding, weaving, and driving on the wrong
side of the road. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes,
and slurred speech. The defendant refused to perform any roadside tests
and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.Defense
Due to evidentiary issues raised by the defense regarding the lack of evidence,
the State Dropped the DUI and he received no criminal conviction or further
penalties other than court costs.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 10, 2024
Case: AFWDDLE
Judge Lawhorne
Facts
The defendant was stopped for failing to yield while making a left turn.
Officers observed an odor of alcohol and glossy/red eyes. She refused
to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later
refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the lack of evidence that
the defendant's normal faculties were impaired, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 6, 2024
Case: AIQEZGE
Judge Komninos
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol,
bloodshot/watery eyes, and mumbled/incoherent speech. She stumbled, swayed,
and appeared clumsy. She also exhibited mood changes going from polite
to belligerent to indifferent. She refused to perform field sobriety tests
and was arrested for DUI. While in the back seat of the patrol car, she
was cursing and kicking the door and the divider between the front seat
and back seat. She later refused a beath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence itself and providing
mitigating evidence on behalf of the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 6, 2024
Case: AI9MJPE
Judge Hessinger
Facts
The defendant was involved in a traffic crash. Officers observed an odor
of alcohol, mumbled/slurred/stuttered speech, a visible sway, and bloodshot/glassy
eyes. He also had a stagger to his walk. The defendant agreed to perform
the HGN (eye test) but refused to perform any other field sobriety tests.
He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was the
defendant's Second DUI.
|
Defense
The firm announced ready for trial. Before the trial date, we pointed out
that the defendant was not the at fault driver. In fact, the officers
concluded that the other driver ran the intersection and t-boned the defendant.
Also, on tape, the defendant's speech was normal and he didn't
stagger. Any sway observed on tape could just have been as easily attributed
to the defendant being t-boned in a crash versus alcohol impairment. The
firm also provided medical records of the defendant, stemming from the
crash, to the State showing that the defendant had received injuries to
his body and head. The State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI prior
to the trial date.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 5, 2024
Case: 23-009941MM10A
Judge Diaz
Facts
Two officers had a car pulled over. The defendant was observed failing
to slow down or move out of the way and nearly struck the police. The
officers then observed the defendant driving on two flat tires. The defendant
was alleged to stumble out of the vehicle. The officers observed slurred
speech, bloodshot eyes and a strong odor of alcohol on her breath. The
defendant refused to participate in any field sobriety tests, and allegedly
stated she was not going to do the exercises because she was drunk. She
was arrested for DUI and refused to perform a breath test.
Defense
The statement admitting to being drunk was not captured on video. In addition,
all of the times on the citations and police reports as well as the refusal
affidavit were inconsistent. The officer went out of his way to prevent
the defendant from being placed on video, including failing to call for
a police unit with a car cam video. Parks & Braxton announced ready
for jury trial. The prosecutor dropped the DUI on the morning of trial.
The defendant walked away with no conviction for any crime on her record.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
|
-
Dec 5, 2024
Case: 24-CT-013300
Judge Rich
Facts
The defendant was stopped after he ran multiple stop signs. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant stated
that he had just came from a bar and had drank alcohol. He then performed
the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was
arrested for DUI and later blew a .162 and .156 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Dec 5, 2024
Case: 24-CT-014232
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Officers observed an
odor of alcohol, slurred speech, tired/lethargic movements, and bloodshot
eyes. After performing various field sobriety tests such a HGN (eye test),
walk and turn, and the one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. He later
blew a .149 and .132 in the breath machine.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 22, 2024
Case: 24-CT-012829
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. Officers noticed an
odor of alcohol, slurred speech, fumbling fingers, and slow/deliberate
movements. He also appeared confused and had a blank/dazed stare. After
performing various field sobriety tests such as HGN (eye test), walk and
turn, and one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .113
and .109 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 22, 2024
Case: 24-CT-009411
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a sideswipe crash. When officers
arrived, they noticed very slurred speech, unsteadiness, and she kept
making moaning noises. There was no odor of alcohol, but they believed
she was impaired by drugs. She performed very poorly on roadside tests
and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a urine test.Defense
Under Florida law (i.e. the DUI statute: 316.1 93) to prove DUI, the State
must prove one is impaired by either alcohol, a specific controlled and/or
a chemical substance. One cannot just be impaired by something like a
bad banana. Here, since there was no odor of alcohol, no alcohol found,
no mention of drugs, and no urine test, the State could not prove by what
was impairing her.Result
The DUI was dismissed.
-
Nov 21, 2024
Case: 24-CT-001224
Judge Poblick
Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and a sway to his stance. After performing
the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises, he was
arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
|
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 20, 2024
Case: 24-CT-011917
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving northbound in the southbound lane.
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, red/glassy eyes, and lethargic movements.
The defendant performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested
for DUI. She later blew a .134 and .133 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 20, 2024
Case: 24-CT-012938
Judge Gutman
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol,
watery eyes, and a blank/dazed look. They also noticed confusion, slurred
speech, poor balance, and poor coordination. He then performed the HGN
(eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested
for DUI and later refused a breath test.Defense
The video totally contradicted the police reports. On tape, his speech
was not slurred, he was not confused, and had no balance or coordination
issues. He performed much better on the field sobriety tests than as described
in the reports. After discussions with the State, they Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: AIQEVVE
Judge Komninos
Facts
The defendant crashed his car into multiple street signs and left the scene.
Officers located the defendant and noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot
eyes, mumbled speech, and he appeared unsteady. He performed poorly on
roadside tests and was arrested for DUI and leaving the scene of an accident.
He later refused a breath test.
Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI and also dropped the leaving the scene of an
accident charge.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
|
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: AJEUA1E
Judge Komninos
Facts
The defendant was stopped for stopping over the stop bar, weaving, and
having trouble maintaining a steady speed. Officers noticed watery/glassy
eyes and slurred speech. When the officer attempted to begin the HGN (eye
test), the defendant ran to the front of her car and tried to make herself
regurgitate by sticking her finger in her throat. Believing she was impaired
by drugs, she then performed the walk and turn, one leg stand, and finger
to nose exercises. She also stated that she takes several prescribed medications.
She was arrested for DUI and later provided a urine sample which came
back positive from FDLE for Klonopin and Oxycodone.
Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
|
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: 24-CT-003029
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was found passed out in his car at a green light. Cars were
driving around him because he obviously wasn't moving. The officer
noticed an odor of alcohol, glossy eyes, and slurred speech. His movements
were slow and lethargic. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety
tests and was arrested for DUI. He later agreed to take a breath test
and blew a .165 and .164 in the breath machine.Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: AITIJEE
Judge Komninos
Facts
Officers were called to a gas station for a suspicious activity call. Upon
arrival, they saw the defendant and his truck with a flat tire on a rim.
An independent witness stated that they saw the defendant drive in on
the flat. Officers saw gauge marks in the pavement and pieces of the truck
were found down the road. Thinking that he had been involved in a crash,
officers then yelled at the defendant to stop and talk to them. He didn't
hear them and was tackled into the glass door of the gas station breaking
the glass door. After tackling him, they noticed an odor of alcohol, unsteadiness,
and bloodshot eyes. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested
for DUI as well as resisting an officer without violence. He later refused
a breath test.Defense
It was obvious on tape that the defendant did not hear the officers and
he was pummeled for no reason. After being tackled, within seconds they
charged him with DUI. On tape, the defendant was not unsteady and his
speech was normal. The State Dropped the DUI and the resisting charge
was dismissed.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: AJF4BPE
Judge Komninos
Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving into oncoming traffic. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes, and he staggered and swayed. The
defendant stated that he had drank a few beers. He then performed various
roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, finger to nose,
and alphabet. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .147 and .146 in
the breath machine.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: 24-CT-002506
Judge Scott
Facts
The defendant was the at fault drive in a sideswipe crash. Officers noticed
an odor of alcohol, slurred speech ,and glassy eyes. He also had difficulty
balancing himself while he walked and was very unsteady. He refused to
do any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused
a breath test. This was the defendant's Third DUI arrest (one prior
conviction for DUI) and he was also charged with Refusing a Breath Test
for the second time.
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 14, 2024
Case: AJF4C4E
Judge Komninos
Facts
A concerned citizen called 911 stating that the defendant was sitting in
his car drinking alcohol. Officers arrived and made contact with the defendant
who was sitting in his car. Officers noticed alcohol (beer and whiskey)
on the front passenger seat and as well as the front seat cup holder.
They observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes,
and he stated that he had drank 4-5 beers. He performed poorly on field
sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .133 and .138
in the breath machine.
|
Defense
After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the DUI, the
State Dropped the DUI.
|
Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 13, 2024
Case: 24-CF-057438
Judge Henderson
Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving erratically. Officers noticed an
odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and mumbled/slurred speech. The defendant
refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later
refused a breath test. A baggie was found with cocaine on the passenger
seat. The defendant was also charged with felony possession of a controlled
substance.Defense
After several conversations with the State, we pointed out that the alleged
driving pattern was not on tape and very vaguely described. Thus, we pointed
out that the stop may be unlawful. The State dropped the DUI and additionally
reduced the felony possession charge to a misdemeanor charge.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-001187
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for running a stop sign. Officers noticed an
odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and glassy eyes. After performing the
HGN (eye test), one leg stand, and walk and turn exercises, she was arrested
for DUI. She later blew a .081 and .081 in the breath machine. This was
the defendant's Second DUI.Defense
Many of the written observations were over exaggerated and were contradicted
the video. In addition, with the .02 margin of error in the breath machine,
we were able to place the defendant breath test results under the legal
limit. The State Dropped her Second DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-004297
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for speeding and running a red light. Officers
noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, unsteadiness, and bloodshot
eyes. The defendant stated that he had consumed a couple of beers. He
then performed various roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later
refused a breath test.Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.Result
The State dropped the DUI.
-
Nov 12, 2024
Case: 24-CT-006956
Judge Farr
Facts
The defendant was stopped for weaving and having an inoperable taillight.
Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and sluggish movements.
He performed poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI.
He later blew a .192 and .187 in the breath machine.
|
Defense
After conversations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant,
the State Dropped the DUI.
Result
The State dropped the DUI.